Be on schedule.Score better.

EN

Description Q – Please read the discussion below and prepare a Reply to this discussion post with comments that further and advance the discussion

Description

Q – Please read the discussion below and prepare a Reply to this discussion post with comments that further and advance the discussion topic.

Discussion

Behaviour of Brave Followers: According to Ira Chaleff’s paradigm, a Brave Follower is someone who is both devoted to the leader and willing to stand up and confront them when they need to (Chaleff, 2009). Instead of sitting on their hands and taking instructions, courageous followers are involved in supporting the leader while also having the courage to speak up when things don’t add up. Initiative, accountability, service, and the willingness to question the status quo in the face of perceived danger define these individuals.

Leadership Compatibility: Courageous Followers’ actions mesh nicely with more collaborative approaches to management. Northouse (2022) argues that leaders who practice participatory leadership include their followers in decision-making, show appreciation for their feedback, and foster an atmosphere of collaboration. When leaders adopt this technique, it creates an environment where courageous followers feel safe voicing their opinions and making positive contributions to group choices.

Organisational Impact: Bold Followers are priceless when it comes to fostering a culture of responsibility, openness, and progress. Their courage to speak up and question authority when called for can improve decision-making and forestall unethical behavior. Their foresight prevents the organization from irrationally following a single leader and makes choices after careful consideration, which can save lives.

Leaders may foster the growth of courageous followers by embracing various approaches that encourage candid dialogue, tolerance of differing viewpoints, and collaborative decision-making. Some examples of approaches are: (Yukl, G. 2013).

A leader’s job is to create a climate that is conducive to free debate and constructive criticism. This culture may be fostered by open-door policy and regular feedback sessions.

As a leader, you may encourage initiative and a sense of responsibility in your followers by giving them more responsibility and latitude to make decisions on their own.

Respecting Dissension: It is critical to acknowledge and respect the role of disagreement in maintaining positive dynamics within an organization. To illustrate this point, leaders should recognize and commend those who bravely voice different opinions, even when they disagree with the leader’s ideals.

If leaders want their followers to be courageous, they need to back them up when they speak up and shield them from harm. This reassurance can help alleviate concerns about potential retaliation and promote open and productive conversations. (Howell, J. M., & Mendez, M. J. 2008).

In conclusion, Chaleff’s description of the Courageous Follower is essential to improving the efficiency and effectiveness of organizational governance. These followers contribute to an organization-wide culture that values collaboration, accountability, and ethics by identifying with participatory leadership. This kind of followership may be fostered by leaders that promote open dialogue, give their followers agency, respect disagreement, and make sure their followers are heard when they speak up.

Reply to Leaders Can’t Lead without Followers
Discussion 1
Q – Please read the discussion below and prepare a Reply to this discussion post with
comments that further and advance the discussion topic.
Please provide the references you used.
Ensure zero plagiarism.
Word limit: 250 words
Discussion
Behaviour of Brave Followers: According to Ira Chaleff’s paradigm, a Brave Follower is someone who
is both devoted to the leader and willing to stand up and confront them when they need to (Chaleff,
2009). Instead of sitting on their hands and taking instructions, courageous followers are involved in
supporting the leader while also having the courage to speak up when things don’t add up. Initiative,
accountability, service, and the willingness to question the status quo in the face of perceived danger
define these individuals.
Leadership Compatibility: Courageous Followers’ actions mesh nicely with more collaborative
approaches to management. Northouse (2022) argues that leaders who practice participatory
leadership include their followers in decision-making, show appreciation for their feedback, and foster
an atmosphere of collaboration. When leaders adopt this technique, it creates an environment where
courageous followers feel safe voicing their opinions and making positive contributions to group
choices.
Organisational Impact: Bold Followers are priceless when it comes to fostering a culture of
responsibility, openness, and progress. Their courage to speak up and question authority when called
for can improve decision-making and forestall unethical behavior. Their foresight prevents the
organization from irrationally following a single leader and makes choices after careful consideration,
which can save lives.
Leaders may foster the growth of courageous followers by embracing various approaches that
encourage candid dialogue, tolerance of differing viewpoints, and collaborative decision-making.
Some examples of approaches are: (Yukl, G. 2013).

A leader’s job is to create a climate that is conducive to free debate and constructive criticism.
This culture may be fostered by open-door policy and regular feedback sessions.
• As a leader, you may encourage initiative and a sense of responsibility in your followers by
giving them more responsibility and latitude to make decisions on their own.
• Respecting Dissension: It is critical to acknowledge and respect the role of disagreement in
maintaining positive dynamics within an organization. To illustrate this point, leaders should
recognize and commend those who bravely voice different opinions, even when they disagree
with the leader’s ideals.
• If leaders want their followers to be courageous, they need to back them up when they speak
up and shield them from harm. This reassurance can help alleviate concerns about potential
retaliation and promote open and productive conversations. (Howell, J. M., & Mendez, M. J.
2008).
In conclusion, Chaleff’s description of the Courageous Follower is essential to improving the efficiency
and effectiveness of organizational governance. These followers contribute to an organization-wide
culture that values collaboration, accountability, and ethics by identifying with participatory leadership.
This kind of followership may be fostered by leaders that promote open dialogue, give their followers
agency, respect disagreement, and make sure their followers are heard when they speak up.
References:
Chaleff, I. (2009). The Courageous Follower: Standing Up to and for Our Leaders. Berrett-Koehler
Publishers.
Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Howell, J. M., & Mendez, M. J. (2008). Three perspectives on followership. In R. E. Riggio, I. Chaleff,
& J. Lipman-Blumen (Eds.), The Art of Followership: How Great Followers Create Great Leaders and
Organizations (pp. 25-39). Jossey-Bass

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Table of Contents

[display_short_calculator]

Latest Reviews

Impressed with the sample above? Wait there is more

Related Questions

IT 226 Project Two Guidelines and Rubric Competency In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competencies: ·

IT 226 Project Two Guidelines and Rubric Competency In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competencies: · Determine appropriate ways to communicate information to internal and external stakeholders · Apply communication techniques to effectively negotiate and manage conflict Scenario You are the manager of a team of 10 software developers working on a new application for your company, Optimum Way Development, which is based out of Raleigh, North Carolina. Your organization recently acquired a smaller software company based in San Jose, California. You have been informed that your team will be bringing on five people from this newly acquired company; all five people will be moving to Raleigh to join your team. You schedule a phone call with the five new team members and discover that they are upset about the recent impersonal message they received from human resources informing them that they would have to relocate to Raleigh in order to stay employed; no one expressed excitement about joining the team. During this conversation, you also discover that many of the new team members have more education and experience than the people currently on your team. Based on the conversation, you notice that most of these team members are likely older than you, whereas all of the current Raleigh team members are younger than you. After the call, one of your current senior team members approaches you about rumors that are circulating concerning the Raleigh team being required to train the new team members from San Jose. They heard that there are plans to eliminate positions and are concerned the new hires will ultimately be taking their positions. The director who oversees your division has requested that you create and present a recommendation report that documents your plans for managing the conflicts that currently exist or may arise on your team. The director has an advanced degree in a computer science-related field and has worked in technology for over a decade. Directions In order to identify and resolve existing and future conflicts, you have been asked to compose and present your plan for managing conflict for this project. In addition to identifying and resolving the conflicts, you are also responsible for keeping the development of the new application moving forward by continuing to meet scheduled milestones. To do this, you will create a recommendation report and corresponding presentation. The audience for both deliverables is your director. As you create your report and presentation, remember to  use communication techniques and platforms that are appropriate for your audience’s preferences and motivations. Both deliverables should be based on the above scenario and include the following: 1. To start,  explain the major elements of the software application, including background, audience, functions, and features. 2. Next,  explain the areas of conflict for the team. Make sure to include contributing factors and the possible impacts. 3. Articulate the desired outcome of any conflict resolution activities.

New questions

Don't Let Questions or Concerns Hold You Back - Make a Free Inquiry Now!