Be on schedule.Score better.

EN

Design is appropriate

Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently. Overall, the presentation is visually appealing and suitable for the intended audience.Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently. The presentation has strong visual appeal and is developed with the intended audience in mind.5.0 %Aesthetic QualityDesign is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality.Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present.Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear. Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message.Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident.5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage

Table of Contents

[display_short_calculator]

Latest Reviews

Impressed with the sample above? Wait there is more

Related Questions

Tribalism

 PRIMARY TEXT: • “This Article Won’t Change Your Mind” by Julie Beck https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/03/this-article-wont-change-your-mind/519093/ PROMPT: In “This Article Won’t Change Your Mind,” Julie Beck examines why

What Do You See? Perceptions of Disability

 Directions: You will complete the “What do you see? Perceptions of Disability” module online (http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/da-5/). 1. Watch the movie (1:08) found in the “Challenge” tab.

New questions

Graduate Custom Essay Services

Writing an essay is already difficult to do, for those without a love of writing. Writing an academic essay is even more challenging, even for

Custom Essays Online

Ordering custom essays online are the perfect solution for those who are either running late with a project, overwhelmed by their workload or else simply

Don't Let Questions or Concerns Hold You Back - Make a Free Inquiry Now!